Skip to content
Method

How the Vendor Map is built

What the map is for, how entries are chosen and described, and what it does not do.

The Vendor Map organises AI cost and value products by the problem each one addresses, so a reader can find the category that fits their need. It describes vendors; it does not rate, score or rank them, and listing is not a recommendation.

Why there are no ratings

Until October 2026 the map gave each vendor editorial ratings for visibility, control, lock-in risk and pricing risk. They were removed on 8 October 2026. The author works for IBM, which sells products in several of the categories the map covers, and an IBM employee rating IBM products beside their competitors has a conflict that no checklist fully removes. Describing products from public sources, and leaving the judgement to the reader, avoids it. See who writes this site.

What goes in

  • Products whose main purpose is to measure, control or prove the cost and value of AI.
  • Each product appears once, under its primary category. Capability tags record secondary roles, such as a gateway inside an observability product.
  • Technologies that change unit costs but are not buyer-side governance products, such as inference hardware, are described separately rather than listed.

How each entry is described

  • Positioning and buyer fit:what the product does and which organisations it is built for, from the vendor’s own documentation.
  • Spend controls it documents: whether the product reports spend, alerts when a threshold is crossed, or enforces a limit that stops further consumption. These are different controls, and the entry says which the vendor documents.
  • Value evidence it is designed to record: adoption and usage, estimated time savings, measured process change, or realised financial benefit. These are not interchangeable: adoption does not show time saved, and time saved does not show money realised.
  • What to check: questions a buyer should ask before relying on the product.

Entries are checked against public sources, which each profile lists with the date last checked. Entries without a date have not yet been checked. A capability that has been announced but not shown to be generally available is noted as such.

IBM-owned products

IBM-owned products are marked IBM-owned wherever they appear and are described in the same way as every other entry. Vendors can send factual corrections about their own products; corrections are judged on the evidence supplied and logged. See also the methodology.