Skip to content

Most organisations cannot prove their AI spend connects to value

This publication exists to close that gap with evidence, frameworks, and governance that would survive an audit.

Flagship frameworks

Close the value gap

Framework

The AI Value Gap

Why most organisations can track AI cost precisely but cannot prove AI value—and what that means for governance, accountability, and portfolio decisions.

Framework

AI TCO Framework

A seven-layer cost model for understanding what AI really costs once orchestration, governance, support, and hidden dependencies are included.

Framework

Value Management Layers

A governance stack for connecting AI usage, output quality, workflow impact, portfolio decisions, and personal accountability across the enterprise.

Framework

Five Levels of AI Economics

A maturity model for moving from fragmented AI activity to governed, provable, portfolio-level AI value that can be defended in an audit.

Why the gap matters

Three statistics on the AI value gap: 39 percent report any EBIT impact, 6 percent see AI above 5 percent of EBIT, 44 percent fund AI from unrealised savings
Adoption is near-universal; provable enterprise return is not. McKinsey (39%/6%) and AIMG (79% no impact) studies use different measurement approaches but converge on the same pattern: most AI spend cannot be connected to proven business value.
Three statistics on the AI value gap: 39 percent report any EBIT impact, 6 percent see AI above 5 percent of EBIT, 44 percent fund AI from unrealised savings

Adoption is near-universal; provable enterprise return is not. McKinsey (39%/6%) and AIMG (79% no impact) studies use different measurement approaches but converge on the same pattern: most AI spend cannot be connected to proven business value.